GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R8 M365DX
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon R8 M365DX, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 280 stacks up against Radeon R8 M365DX, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 280
Radeon R8 M365DX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R8 M365DX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R8 M365DX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon R8 M365DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R8 M365DX uses IGP interface.
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R8 M365DX - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 280 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R8 M365DX - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 576 MHz higher, than Radeon R8 M365DX.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Radeon R8 M365DX - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 307 MHz higher, than Radeon R8 M365DX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R8 M365DX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 189% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Dota 2 is 124% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Minecraft is 69% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | − |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in World of Tanks is 96% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon R8 M365DX | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GT200 | Meso |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 June 2008 | 3 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 720 / 1125 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1125 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | 27.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 + 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 800 / 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 240 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |