GRID K280Q vs Radeon R8 M365DX
When comparing GRID K280Q and Radeon R8 M365DX, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K280Q and Radeon R8 M365DX is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K280Q
Radeon R8 M365DX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R8 M365DX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R8 M365DX here:
Main Specs
| GRID K280Q | Radeon R8 M365DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K280Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R8 M365DX uses IGP interface.
- GRID K280Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon R8 M365DX - in Laptops.
- GRID K280Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R8 M365DX - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GRID K280Q is 25 MHz higher, than Radeon R8 M365DX.
- GRID K280Q and Radeon R8 M365DX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K280Q is 4200 MHz higher, than Radeon R8 M365DX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2400% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R8 M365DX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 385% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R8 M365DX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Dota 2 is 220% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Fortnite is 295% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 278% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in Minecraft is 36% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 487% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K280Q in World of Tanks is 168% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K280Q | Radeon R8 M365DX | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
| Code name | GK104 | Meso |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 3 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 720 / 1125 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1125 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 27.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 + 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 800 / 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |