GRID M60 2Q vs Radeon R8 M365DX
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID M60 2Q and Radeon R8 M365DX. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID M60 2Q and Radeon R8 M365DX. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID M60 2Q
Radeon R8 M365DX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R8 M365DX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R8 M365DX here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 2Q | Radeon R8 M365DX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 2Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R8 M365DX uses IGP interface.
- GRID M60 2Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon R8 M365DX - in Laptops.
- GRID M60 2Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R8 M365DX - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R8 M365DX is 163 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
- GRID M60 2Q and Radeon R8 M365DX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 2Q is 4212 MHz higher, than Radeon R8 M365DX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GRID M60 2Q and Radeon R8 M365DX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
GRID M60 2Q and Radeon R8 M365DX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 740% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 140−150 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
low / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 75% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
low / 768p | 130−140 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 188% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 2Q | Radeon R8 M365DX | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | GM204 | Meso |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 3 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 720 / 1125 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 27.00 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 + 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 800 / 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |