P106 090 vs Radeon R8 M365DX
In this comparison between P106 090 and Radeon R8 M365DX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people P106 090 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R8 M365DX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
P106 090
Radeon R8 M365DX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R8 M365DX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R8 M365DX here:
Main Specs
| P106 090 | Radeon R8 M365DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- P106 090 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R8 M365DX uses IGP interface.
- P106 090 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R8 M365DX - in Laptops.
- P106 090 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R8 M365DX - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of P106 090 is 634 MHz higher, than Radeon R8 M365DX.
- P106 090 is manufactured by 16 nm process technology, and Radeon R8 M365DX - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P106 090 is 7208 MHz higher, than Radeon R8 M365DX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R8 M365DX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 200−210 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 170−180 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 453% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R8 M365DX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than P106 090. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Dota 2 is 255% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Fortnite is 340% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Grand Theft Auto V is 357% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of P106 090 in World of Tanks is 192% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
Full Specs
| P106 090 | Radeon R8 M365DX | |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN |
| Code name | GP106 | Meso |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 31 July 2017 | 3 June 2015 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 720 / 1125 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 73.49 | 27.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,352 gflops | |
| Length | 250 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 + 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 800 / 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |