Quadro 500M vs Radeon R8 M365DX
When comparing Quadro 500M and Radeon R8 M365DX, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Quadro 500M and Radeon R8 M365DX is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 500M
Radeon R8 M365DX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R8 M365DX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R8 M365DX here:
Main Specs
Quadro 500M | Radeon R8 M365DX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | IGP |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro 500M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R8 M365DX uses IGP interface.
- Quadro 500M is used in Desktops, and Radeon R8 M365DX - in Laptops.
- Quadro 500M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R8 M365DX - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R8 M365DX is 20 MHz higher, than Quadro 500M.
- Quadro 500M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R8 M365DX - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 500M is 1000 MHz higher, than Radeon R8 M365DX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro 500M and Radeon R8 M365DX have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro 500M and Radeon R8 M365DX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
Quadro 500M and Radeon R8 M365DX have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
Quadro 500M and Radeon R8 M365DX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro 500M and Radeon R8 M365DX have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro 500M and Radeon R8 M365DX have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
Quadro 500M and Radeon R8 M365DX have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
Quadro 500M and Radeon R8 M365DX have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
Quadro 500M and Radeon R8 M365DX have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
Quadro 500M and Radeon R8 M365DX have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
Quadro 500M | Radeon R8 M365DX | |
Architecture | Fermi | GCN |
Code name | GF108 | Meso |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 22 February 2011 | 3 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 96 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 700 MHz | 720 / 1125 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1125 MHz | |
Transistor count | 585 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 11.20 | 27.00 |
Floating-point performance | 268.8 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 + 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 800 / 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |