Radeon R5 430 OEM vs Radeon R8 M365DX
When comparing Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R8 M365DX, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R8 M365DX is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Radeon R8 M365DX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R8 M365DX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R8 M365DX here:
Main Specs
Radeon R5 430 OEM | Radeon R8 M365DX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon R5 430 OEM is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R8 M365DX uses IGP interface.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM is used in Desktops, and Radeon R8 M365DX - in Laptops.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R8 M365DX - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 10 MHz higher, than Radeon R8 M365DX.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM and Radeon R8 M365DX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 3800 MHz higher, than Radeon R8 M365DX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R8 M365DX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Dota 2 is 106% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Fortnite is 113% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Minecraft is 54% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 9−10 | − |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in World of Tanks is 104% more, than Radeon R8 M365DX. |
Full Specs
Radeon R5 430 OEM | Radeon R8 M365DX | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN |
Code name | Oland | Meso |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 30 June 2016 | 3 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 730 MHz | 720 / 1125 MHz |
Boost Clock | 780 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Transistor count | 950 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 18.72 | 27.00 |
Floating-point performance | 599.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 + 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 800 / 1000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 36.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |