FirePro M5950 vs Radeon R8 M535DX
When choosing between FirePro M5950 and Radeon R8 M535DX, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro M5950 and Radeon R8 M535DX.
Radeon R8 M535DX
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M5950 | Radeon R8 M535DX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | IGP |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R8 M535DX uses IGP interface.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R8 M535DX - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Radeon R8 M535DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R8 M535DX is 55 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R8 M535DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R8 M535DX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
FirePro M5950 and Radeon R8 M535DX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Dota 2 is 124% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Fortnite is 159% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Grand Theft Auto V is 147% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Minecraft is 12% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
low / 768p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in World of Tanks is 108% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. |
Full Specs
FirePro M5950 | Radeon R8 M535DX | |
Architecture | Terascale 2 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Whistler-XT | Meso |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 13 April 2011 | 18 April 2017 |
Pipelines | 480 | 320 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 780 MHz |
Boost Clock | 891 MHz | |
Transistor count | 716 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 17.82 |
Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | n/a | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
Check Price |