FirePro S10000 vs Radeon R8 M535DX
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S10000 and Radeon R8 M535DX, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S10000 stacks up against Radeon R8 M535DX, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S10000
Radeon R8 M535DX
Main Specs
| FirePro S10000 | Radeon R8 M535DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
- FirePro S10000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R8 M535DX uses IGP interface.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon R8 M535DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 45 MHz higher, than Radeon R8 M535DX.
- FirePro S10000 and Radeon R8 M535DX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S10000 and Radeon R8 M535DX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| FirePro S10000 and Radeon R8 M535DX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 740% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 75% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S10000 | Radeon R8 M535DX | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Tahiti | Meso |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 12 November 2012 | 18 April 2017 |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 891 MHz |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 106.4 | 17.82 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | |
| Length | 305 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |