Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon R8 M535DX
When choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon R8 M535DX, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon R8 M535DX.
Radeon R8 M535DX
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Radeon R8 M535DX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | IGP |
Memory type | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon R8 M535DX uses IGP interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R8 M535DX - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon R8 M535DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R8 M535DX is 480 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R8 M535DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R8 M535DX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 285% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R8 M535DX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 165% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 204% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 79% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 768p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 20−22 | − |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 140% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650 | Radeon R8 M535DX | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Meso |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 3 January 2017 | 18 April 2017 |
Pipelines | 48 | 320 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 780 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 891 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 55.20 | 17.82 |
Floating-point performance | 883 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.2.131 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |