Iris Plus Graphics 655 vs Radeon R8 M535DX
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics 655 and Radeon R8 M535DX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics 655 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R8 M535DX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R8 M535DX
Iris Plus Graphics 655 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 655 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 655 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon R8 M535DX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | IGP |
Memory type | DDR3/DDR4 | System Shared |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon R8 M535DX uses IGP interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R8 M535DX - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon R8 M535DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R8 M535DX is 480 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 655.
- Iris Plus Graphics 655 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R8 M535DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R8 M535DX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 410% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R8 M535DX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 655. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Dota 2 is 231% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Fortnite is 295% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Grand Theft Auto V is 305% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in Minecraft is 36% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 655 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. |
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 | Radeon R8 M535DX | |
Architecture | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Kaby Lake GT3e | Meso |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 September 2017 | 18 April 2017 |
Pipelines | 48 | 320 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 780 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 891 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,550 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 17.82 |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.2.131 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |