Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon R8 M535DX
When comparing Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Radeon R8 M535DX, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Radeon R8 M535DX is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R8 M535DX
Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
| Iris Xe Graphics G7 | Radeon R8 M535DX | |
| Interface | IGP | |
| Memory type | DDR4 | System Shared |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R8 M535DX - in Desktops.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Radeon R8 M535DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon R8 M535DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3100% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Radeon R8 M535DX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 478% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Radeon R8 M535DX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 265% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 377% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 384% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 675% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Xe Graphics G7 | Radeon R8 M535DX | |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | Tiger Lake Xe | Meso |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 15 August 2020 | 18 April 2017 |
| Pipelines | 96 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 780 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 891 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,550 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.82 | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
- Radeon R8 M535DX vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI
- Radeon R8 M535DX vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 4000
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs NVS 510
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs GRID K160Q
- Radeon R8 M535DX vs NVS 510
- Radeon R8 M535DX vs GRID K160Q