Radeon R8 M535DX vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
In this comparison between Radeon R8 M535DX and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R8 M535DX will be the best choice, for others Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R8 M535DX
Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:
Main Specs
| Radeon R8 M535DX | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
| Interface | IGP | |
| Memory type | System Shared | DDR4 |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R8 M535DX is used in Desktops, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - in Laptops.
- Radeon R8 M535DX is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Radeon R8 M535DX is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3000% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon R8 M535DX and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 439% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| Radeon R8 M535DX and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 255% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 340% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 331% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 49% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than Radeon R8 M535DX. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon R8 M535DX | Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 | |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
| Code name | Meso | Tiger Lake Xe |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 18 April 2017 | 15 August 2020 |
| Pipelines | 320 | 96 |
| Core clock speed | 780 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 891 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,550 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.82 | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 6.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon R8 M535DX vs NVS 510
- Radeon R8 M535DX vs GRID K160Q
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs NVS 510
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GRID K160Q
- Radeon R8 M535DX vs GeForce GTX 950
- Radeon R8 M535DX vs Radeon Pro WX 5100
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs GeForce GTX 950
- Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100