Quadro 2000 vs Radeon R9 270

When choosing between Quadro 2000 and Radeon R9 270, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro 2000 and Radeon R9 270.

Quadro 2000 Check Price

Radeon R9 270 Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro 2000	Radeon R9 270
Power consumption (TDP)	62 Watt	150 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon R9 270 has 141% more power consumption, than Quadro 2000.
Quadro 2000 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 270 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon R9 270 has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro 2000.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro 2000 is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R9 270 - with GCN 1.0.
Quadro 2000 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 270 - by 28 nm process technology.
Radeon R9 270 is 32 mm longer, than Quadro 2000.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	1−2	21−24
ultra / 1080p	0−1	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	10−12	40−45
medium / 1080p	2−3	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 520% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p	−	30−35
ultra / 1080p	3−4	30−33
QHD / 1440p	0−1	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	12−14	70−75
medium / 1080p	4−5	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270 in Battlefield 5 is 571% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro 2000 and Radeon R9 270 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	110−120	230−240
medium / 768p	85−90	200−210
ultra / 1080p	35−40	120−130
QHD / 1440p	−	95−100
4K / 2160p	10−11	55−60
high / 768p	60−65	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 156% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p	70−75	120−130
medium / 768p	45−50	110−120
ultra / 1080p	18−20	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270 in Dota 2 is 132% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p	2−3	27−30
ultra / 1080p	2−3	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	20−22
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
low / 720p	10−11	55−60
medium / 1080p	3−4	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270 in Far Cry 5 is 775% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p	−	35−40
ultra / 1080p	5−6	27−30
QHD / 1440p	1−2	16−18
low / 720p	45−50	130−140
medium / 1080p	8−9	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270 in Fortnite is 326% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p	3−4	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	14−16
low / 720p	14−16	70−75
medium / 1080p	5−6	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270 in Forza Horizon 4 is 525% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p	40−45	100−110
medium / 768p	−	95−100
high / 1080p	3−4	40−45
ultra / 1080p	2−3	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270 in Grand Theft Auto V is 243% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p	1−2	14−16
ultra / 1080p	0−1	10−12
QHD / 1440p	−	10−12
4K / 2160p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	3−4	40−45
medium / 1080p	2−3	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270 in Metro Exodus is 1150% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p	85−90	120−130
high / 1080p	55−60	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270 in Minecraft is 43% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	24−27	70−75
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Quadro 2000.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	3−4	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	4−5	40−45
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 550% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p	8−9	75−80
medium / 768p	7−8	45−50
high / 1080p	3−4	27−30
ultra / 1080p	3−4	14−16
4K / 2160p	0−1	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 740% more, than Quadro 2000.
low / 768p	70−75	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	12−14	40−45
high / 768p	30−33	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270 in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Quadro 2000.

Full Specs

	Quadro 2000	Radeon R9 270
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 1.0
Code name	GF106	Curacao
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	24 December 2010	13 November 2013
Pipelines	192	1280
Core clock speed	625 MHz
Boost Clock		925 MHz
Transistor count	1,170 million	2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	20.00	74.00
Floating-point performance	480.0 gflops	2,368 gflops
Length	178 mm	210 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2600 MHz
Memory bandwidth	41.6 GB/s	179.2 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	+
CUDA	2.1
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	31 Mh/s	293 Mh/s
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
TrueAudio		+
Design		reference
DisplayPort support		+
CrossFire		+
DDMA audio		+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		16 Mh/s
LiquidVR		+
TressFX		+
UVD		+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro 2000 vs Radeon R9 270

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares