Quadro K2000M vs Radeon R9 270
In this comparison between Quadro K2000M and Radeon R9 270 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 270 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro K2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K2000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro K2000M
Radeon R9 270
Power consumption (TDP)
55 Watt
150 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1 x 6-pin
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon R9 270 has 172% more power consumption, than Quadro K2000M.
Quadro K2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 270 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K2000M and Radeon R9 270 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Quadro K2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 270 - in Desktops.
Quadro K2000M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 270 - with GCN 1.0.
Quadro K2000M and Radeon R9 270 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
1−2
21−24
ultra / 1080p
0−1
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
12−14
40−45
medium / 1080p
3−4
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
−
30−35
ultra / 1080p
4−5
30−33
QHD / 1440p
0−1
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
16−18
70−75
medium / 1080p
5−6
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270 in Battlefield 5 is 422% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 1080p
50−55
−
Quadro K2000M and Radeon R9 270 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
120−130
230−240
medium / 768p
90−95
200−210
ultra / 1080p
40−45
120−130
QHD / 1440p
21−24
95−100
4K / 2160p
18−20
55−60
high / 768p
65−70
170−180
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 144% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
50−55
medium / 1080p
50−55
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
70−75
120−130
medium / 768p
45−50
110−120
ultra / 1080p
21−24
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270 in Dota 2 is 127% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
2−3
27−30
ultra / 1080p
2−3
24−27
QHD / 1440p
−
20−22
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
10−12
55−60
medium / 1080p
3−4
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270 in Far Cry 5 is 775% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
10−11
35−40
ultra / 1080p
5−6
27−30
QHD / 1440p
2−3
16−18
low / 720p
50−55
130−140
medium / 1080p
10−12
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270 in Fortnite is 268% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
5−6
35−40
ultra / 1080p
5−6
27−30
QHD / 1440p
0−1
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
14−16
low / 720p
16−18
70−75
medium / 1080p
8−9
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270 in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
40−45
100−110
medium / 768p
−
95−100
high / 1080p
5−6
40−45
ultra / 1080p
2−3
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270 in Grand Theft Auto V is 243% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
1−2
14−16
ultra / 1080p
0−1
10−12
QHD / 1440p
−
10−12
4K / 2160p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
5−6
40−45
medium / 1080p
3−4
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270 in Metro Exodus is 733% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
90−95
120−130
high / 1080p
85−90
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270 in Minecraft is 30% more, than Quadro K2000M.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
27−30
70−75
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Quadro K2000M.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
6−7
40−45
medium / 1080p
−
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
12−14
75−80
medium / 768p
8−9
45−50
high / 1080p
4−5
27−30
ultra / 1080p
3−4
14−16
4K / 2160p
0−1
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than Quadro K2000M.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
40−45
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Quadro K2000M.
Full Specs
Quadro K2000M
Radeon R9 270
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Code name
N14P-Q3
Curacao
Type
Mobile workstation
Desktop
Release date
1 June 2012
13 November 2013
Pipelines
384
1280
Core clock speed
745 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
23.84
74.00
Floating-point performance
572.2 gflops
2,368 gflops
Length
210 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
179.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
+
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
18 Mh/s
293 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Optimus
+
Eyefinity
+
HD3D
+
TrueAudio
+
Design
reference
DisplayPort support
+
CrossFire
+
DDMA audio
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
16 Mh/s
LiquidVR
+
TressFX
+
UVD
+
Check Price
Check Price
