Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon R9 270X
When choosing between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon R9 270X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Plus Graphics 650 and Radeon R9 270X.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Radeon R9 270X
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
180 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
2 x 6-pin
Memory type
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
32 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon R9 270X has 1100% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon R9 270X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 30 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 270X.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 270X - in Desktops.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is build with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake architecture, and Radeon R9 270X - with GCN.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 270X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
24−27
ultra / 1080p
5−6
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
10−11
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
14−16
40−45
ultra / 1080p
12−14
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
10−12
low / 720p
30−33
80−85
medium / 1080p
14−16
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Battlefield 5 is 183% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
150−160
240−250
medium / 768p
120−130
210−220
ultra / 1080p
60−65
140−150
QHD / 1440p
35−40
110−120
4K / 2160p
27−30
60−65
high / 768p
90−95
180−190
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 93% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
85−90
120−130
medium / 768p
65−70
110−120
ultra / 1080p
40−45
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Dota 2 is 69% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
10−11
30−35
ultra / 1080p
9−10
27−30
QHD / 1440p
−
21−24
4K / 2160p
4−5
10−11
low / 720p
21−24
60−65
medium / 1080p
10−11
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
16−18
40−45
ultra / 1080p
12−14
30−35
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
low / 720p
65−70
140−150
medium / 1080p
27−30
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Fortnite is 145% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
14−16
40−45
ultra / 1080p
12−14
30−35
QHD / 1440p
2−3
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
low / 720p
30−35
80−85
medium / 1080p
16−18
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Forza Horizon 4 is 175% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
60−65
110−120
medium / 768p
50−55
100−110
high / 1080p
16−18
50−55
ultra / 1080p
7−8
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Grand Theft Auto V is 114% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
5−6
16−18
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
QHD / 1440p
−
12−14
4K / 2160p
1−2
4−5
low / 720p
14−16
45−50
medium / 1080p
7−8
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Metro Exodus is 233% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
95−100
120−130
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
−
medium / 1080p
95−100
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Minecraft is 23% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
80−85
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 65% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
8−9
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
3−4
low / 720p
14−16
45−50
medium / 1080p
12−14
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 133% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
30−35
90−95
medium / 768p
20−22
55−60
high / 1080p
10−12
30−35
ultra / 1080p
7−8
18−20
4K / 2160p
6−7
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
45−50
high / 768p
40−45
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in World of Tanks is 27% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Radeon R9 270X
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
GCN
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
Curacao XT
Type
Laptop
Desktop
Release date
3 January 2017
8 October 2013
Pipelines
48
1280
Core clock speed
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
1050 MHz
Transistor count
189 million
2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
55.20
84.00
Floating-point performance
883 gflops
2,688 gflops
Memory bus width
64/128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.103
+
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
318 Mh/s
Eyefinity
+
HD3D
+
TrueAudio
+
Design
reference
DisplayPort support
+
CrossFire
+
DDMA audio
+
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
30 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)
163 Sol/s
Quick Sync
+
AppAcceleration
+
LiquidVR
+
TressFX
+
UVD
+
Check Price
Check Price