Quadro K2200M vs Radeon R9 270X

In this comparison between Quadro K2200M and Radeon R9 270X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2200M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 270X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Main Specs

  Quadro K2200M Radeon R9 270X
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 180 Watt
Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 2 x 6-pin
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
  Check Price
  • Radeon R9 270X has 176% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
  • Quadro K2200M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 270X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
  • Quadro K2200M and Radeon R9 270X have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • Quadro K2200M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 270X - with GCN.
  • Quadro K2200M and Radeon R9 270X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 20−22 24−27
ultra / 1080p 12−14 14−16
QHD / 1440p 6−7 10−11
4K / 2160p 5−6 6−7
low / 720p 35−40 45−50
medium / 1080p 24−27 30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 270X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 22% more, than Quadro K2200M.

Full Specs

  Quadro K2200M Radeon R9 270X
Architecture Maxwell GCN
Code name GM107 Curacao XT
Type Workstation Desktop
Release date 19 July 2014 8 October 2013
Pipelines 640 1280
Core clock speed 667 MHz
Boost Clock 1050 MHz
Transistor count 1,870 million 2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 26.68 84.00
Floating-point performance 853.8 gflops 2,688 gflops
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth 80 GB/s 179.2 GB/s
Shared memory -
DirectX 12
Shader Model 5 5.1
OpenGL 4.5 4.6
OpenCL 1.2 1.2
Vulkan 1.1.126 +
CUDA 5.0
FreeSync +
Bus support PCIe 3.0
HDMI +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 318 Mh/s
Optimus +
Eyefinity +
HD3D +
TrueAudio +
Design reference
DisplayPort support +
CrossFire +
DDMA audio +
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 30 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 163 Sol/s
Display Port 1.2
3D Vision Pro +
Mosaic +
nView Display Management +
AppAcceleration +
LiquidVR +
TressFX +
UVD +
  Check Price