GeForce GTX 465 vs Radeon R9 280X
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 465 and Radeon R9 280X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 465 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 280X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Radeon R9 280X
Power consumption (TDP)
200 Watt
250 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Two 6-pins
1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
3 GB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon R9 280X has 25% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 465.
GeForce GTX 465 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 280X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon R9 280X has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 465.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GeForce GTX 465 is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R9 280X - with GCN.
GeForce GTX 465 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 280X - by 28 nm process technology.
Radeon R9 280X is 266 mm longer, than GeForce GTX 465.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
8−9
21−24
QHD / 1440p
3−4
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
30−33
60−65
medium / 1080p
18−20
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
21−24
55−60
ultra / 1080p
20−22
45−50
QHD / 1440p
6−7
35−40
4K / 2160p
5−6
18−20
low / 720p
50−55
100−110
medium / 1080p
24−27
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
200−210
250−260
medium / 768p
170−180
220−230
ultra / 1080p
95−100
180−190
QHD / 1440p
50−55
110−120
4K / 2160p
30−33
70−75
high / 768p
130−140
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
100−110
120−130
medium / 768p
90−95
110−120
ultra / 1080p
60−65
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Dota 2 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
16−18
45−50
ultra / 1080p
14−16
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
6−7
14−16
low / 720p
35−40
80−85
medium / 1080p
18−20
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
24−27
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
QHD / 1440p
16−18
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
95−100
180−190
medium / 1080p
50−55
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Fortnite is 107% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
24−27
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
QHD / 1440p
8−9
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
50−55
100−110
medium / 1080p
27−30
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Forza Horizon 4 is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
80−85
140−150
medium / 768p
70−75
120−130
high / 1080p
27−30
70−75
ultra / 1080p
12−14
30−35
QHD / 1440p
2−3
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Grand Theft Auto V is 102% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
9−10
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
2−3
8−9
low / 720p
27−30
65−70
medium / 1080p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
110−120
130−140
ultra / 1080p
100−110
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
100−110
medium / 1080p
24−27
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
high / 1080p
14−16
24−27
ultra / 1080p
9−10
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
27−30
65−70
medium / 1080p
16−18
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
50−55
130−140
medium / 768p
30−35
85−90
high / 1080p
18−20
45−50
ultra / 1080p
10−11
24−27
4K / 2160p
8−9
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
low / 768p
100−110
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
50−55
high / 768p
50−55
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 465.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 465
Radeon R9 280X
Architecture
Fermi
GCN
Code name
GF100
Thaiti XTL
Type
Desktop
Desktop
Release date
31 May 2010
8 October 2013
Pipelines
352
2048
Core clock speed
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
Transistor count
3,100 million
4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
26.7 billion/sec
128.0
Floating-point performance
855.4 gflops
4,096 gflops
Length
9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm)
275 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
1603 MHz (3206 data rate)
Memory bandwidth
102.6 GB/s
288 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.2
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
+
CUDA
+
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.5 kh/s
FreeSync
+
CUDA cores
352
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0 x 16
PCIe 3.0
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
Internal
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
64 Mh/s
494 Mh/s
Eyefinity
+
HD3D
+
TrueAudio
+
Design
reference
DisplayPort support
+
CrossFire
+
DDMA audio
+
Decred / DCR (Decred)
1.07 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
14.42 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)
285 Sol/s
Compute performance
30x
AppAcceleration
+
LiquidVR
+
TressFX
+
UVD
+
Check Price
Check Price