Quadro P1000 vs Radeon R9 280X

When choosing between Quadro P1000 and Radeon R9 280X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro P1000 and Radeon R9 280X.

Quadro P1000 Check Price

Radeon R9 280X Check Price

Main Specs

	Quadro P1000	Radeon R9 280X
Power consumption (TDP)	47 Watt	250 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	3 GB
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Radeon R9 280X has 431% more power consumption, than Quadro P1000.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro P1000 has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 280X.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro P1000 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R9 280X - with GCN.
Quadro P1000 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 280X - by 28 nm process technology.
Radeon R9 280X is 130 mm longer, than Quadro P1000.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	21−24	35−40
ultra / 1080p	12−14	21−24
QHD / 1440p	8−9	16−18
4K / 2160p	5−6	10−11
low / 720p	40−45	60−65
medium / 1080p	27−30	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than Quadro P1000.
high / 1080p	35−40	55−60
ultra / 1080p	30−35	45−50
QHD / 1440p	14−16	35−40
4K / 2160p	9−10	18−20
low / 720p	70−75	100−110
medium / 1080p	40−45	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Battlefield 5 is 58% more, than Quadro P1000.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
Quadro P1000 and Radeon R9 280X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	230−240	250−260
medium / 768p	200−210	220−230
ultra / 1080p	120−130	180−190
QHD / 1440p	100−110	110−120
4K / 2160p	55−60	70−75
high / 768p	170−180	210−220
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than Quadro P1000.
low / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	55−60	−
medium / 1080p	55−60	55−60
Quadro P1000 and Radeon R9 280X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	120−130	120−130
medium / 768p	110−120	110−120
ultra / 1080p	85−90	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Quadro P1000.
high / 1080p	27−30	45−50
ultra / 1080p	24−27	40−45
QHD / 1440p	20−22	27−30
4K / 2160p	8−9	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	80−85
medium / 1080p	30−33	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Far Cry 5 is 53% more, than Quadro P1000.
high / 1080p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	45−50
QHD / 1440p	16−18	27−30
4K / 2160p	−	27−30
low / 720p	130−140	180−190
medium / 1080p	75−80	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Fortnite is 47% more, than Quadro P1000.
high / 1080p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	27−30	45−50
QHD / 1440p	16−18	30−35
4K / 2160p	14−16	24−27
low / 720p	75−80	100−110
medium / 1080p	40−45	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Forza Horizon 4 is 55% more, than Quadro P1000.
low / 768p	110−120	140−150
medium / 768p	95−100	120−130
high / 1080p	45−50	70−75
ultra / 1080p	18−20	30−35
QHD / 1440p	9−10	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Grand Theft Auto V is 38% more, than Quadro P1000.
high / 1080p	14−16	24−27
ultra / 1080p	10−12	20−22
QHD / 1440p	10−12	16−18
4K / 2160p	3−4	8−9
low / 720p	40−45	65−70
medium / 1080p	20−22	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Metro Exodus is 64% more, than Quadro P1000.
low / 768p	120−130	130−140
medium / 1080p	110−120	120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Minecraft is 8% more, than Quadro P1000.
ultra / 1080p	14−16	14−16
low / 720p	75−80	100−110
medium / 1080p	18−20	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 24% more, than Quadro P1000.
high / 1080p	16−18	24−27
ultra / 1080p	10−12	16−18
QHD / 1440p	3−4	10−11
4K / 2160p	2−3	7−8
low / 720p	40−45	65−70
medium / 1080p	21−24	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than Quadro P1000.
low / 768p	80−85	130−140
medium / 768p	50−55	85−90
high / 1080p	27−30	45−50
ultra / 1080p	16−18	24−27
4K / 2160p	9−10	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 63% more, than Quadro P1000.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	60−65
ultra / 1080p	40−45	50−55
high / 768p	55−60	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Quadro P1000.

Full Specs

	Quadro P1000	Radeon R9 280X
Architecture	Pascal	GCN
Code name	GP107	Thaiti XTL
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	1 February 2017	8 October 2013
Pipelines	512	2048
Core clock speed	1493 MHz
Boost Clock	1519 MHz	1000 MHz
Transistor count	3,300 million	4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	59.20	128.0
Floating-point performance	1,894 gflops	4,096 gflops
Length	145 mm	275 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB/s	288 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
DirectX	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2	+
CUDA	6.1
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)		0.5 kh/s
FreeSync		+
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
HDMI		+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		494 Mh/s
Optimus	+
Eyefinity		+
HD3D		+
TrueAudio		+
Design		reference
DisplayPort support		+
CrossFire		+
DDMA audio		+
Decred / DCR (Decred)		1.07 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)		14.42 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)		285 Sol/s
AppAcceleration		+
LiquidVR		+
TressFX		+
UVD		+
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro P1000 vs Radeon R9 280X

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares