Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon R9 280X
When comparing Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon R9 280X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon R9 280X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Radeon R9 280X
Power consumption (TDP)
65 Watt
250 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
3 GB
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon R9 280X has 284% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 280X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 280X.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 280X - in Desktops.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R9 280X - with GCN.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 280X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
12−14
35−40
ultra / 1080p
7−8
21−24
QHD / 1440p
2−3
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
16−18
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 176% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
21−24
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
QHD / 1440p
4−5
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
45−50
100−110
medium / 1080p
21−24
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Battlefield 5 is 169% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
190−200
250−260
medium / 768p
160−170
220−230
ultra / 1080p
85−90
180−190
QHD / 1440p
50−55
110−120
4K / 2160p
30−33
70−75
high / 768p
120−130
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 62% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
35−40
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
100−110
120−130
medium / 768p
85−90
110−120
ultra / 1080p
55−60
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Dota 2 is 38% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
14−16
45−50
ultra / 1080p
14−16
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
5−6
14−16
low / 720p
30−35
80−85
medium / 1080p
16−18
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Far Cry 5 is 176% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
21−24
60−65
ultra / 1080p
16−18
45−50
QHD / 1440p
16−18
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
90−95
180−190
medium / 1080p
45−50
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Fortnite is 123% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
21−24
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
QHD / 1440p
7−8
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
45−50
100−110
medium / 1080p
24−27
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
75−80
140−150
medium / 768p
65−70
120−130
high / 1080p
24−27
70−75
ultra / 1080p
10−12
30−35
QHD / 1440p
1−2
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Grand Theft Auto V is 119% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
8−9
24−27
ultra / 1080p
6−7
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
2−3
8−9
low / 720p
24−27
65−70
medium / 1080p
10−12
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
100−110
130−140
ultra / 1080p
100−105
−
medium / 1080p
100−110
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Minecraft is 23% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
21−24
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
14−16
low / 720p
50−55
100−110
medium / 1080p
21−24
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
9−10
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
24−27
65−70
medium / 1080p
14−16
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
45−50
130−140
medium / 768p
27−30
85−90
high / 1080p
16−18
45−50
ultra / 1080p
10−11
24−27
4K / 2160p
7−8
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 181% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
95−100
90−95
medium / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
30−35
50−55
high / 768p
50−55
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 280X in World of Tanks is 11% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Full Specs
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Radeon R9 280X
Architecture
Polaris
GCN
Code name
Polaris 12
Thaiti XTL
Type
Mobile workstation
Desktop
Release date
26 September 2019
8 October 2013
Pipelines
640
2048
Core clock speed
1082 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
Transistor count
2,200 million
4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
41.44
128.0
Floating-point performance
4,096 gflops
Length
275 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
288 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
+
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)
0.5 kh/s
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
494 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Eyefinity
+
HD3D
+
TrueAudio
+
Design
reference
DisplayPort support
+
CrossFire
+
DDMA audio
+
Decred / DCR (Decred)
1.07 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)
14.42 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)
285 Sol/s
AppAcceleration
+
LiquidVR
+
TressFX
+
UVD
+
Check Price
Check Price
