FirePro M4000 vs Radeon R9 370
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro M4000 and Radeon R9 370, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro M4000 stacks up against Radeon R9 370, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R9 370
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4000 | Radeon R9 370 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 110 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 370 has 233% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 370 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 370 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 370 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon R9 370 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 325 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 and Radeon R9 370 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 1100 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 121% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Dota 2 is 79% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Fortnite is 229% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 320% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Minecraft is 34% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than FirePro M4000. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4000 | Radeon R9 370 | |
Architecture | GCN | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Cape Verde GLM | Trinidad |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 1 July 2012 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 512 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 925 MHz |
Boost Clock | 975 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 2,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 78.00 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
Length | 221 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 5600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | n/a | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | 336 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
Check Price |