FirePro V5800 vs Radeon R9 370
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro V5800 and Radeon R9 370, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro V5800 stacks up against Radeon R9 370, check out specs charts below.
FirePro V5800
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R9 370
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
FirePro V5800 | Radeon R9 370 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 110 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
- Radeon R9 370 has 48% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 370 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 370 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon R9 370 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 235 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 370 - by 28 nm process technology.
- FirePro V5800 is 8 mm longer, than Radeon R9 370.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 1600 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 412% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Battlefield 5 is 423% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 149% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Far Cry 5 is 422% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Fortnite is 292% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 425% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 232% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Metro Exodus is 500% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Minecraft is 41% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 119% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 344% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 461% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in World of Tanks is 45% more, than FirePro V5800. |
Full Specs
FirePro V5800 | Radeon R9 370 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Juniper | Trinidad |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 26 April 2010 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 800 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 925 MHz |
Boost Clock | 975 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 2,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 78.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
Length | 229 mm | 221 mm |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 336 Mh/s | |