GeForce 840A vs Radeon R9 370
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 840A and Radeon R9 370, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 840A stacks up against Radeon R9 370, check out specs charts below.
GeForce 840A
Radeon R9 370
Main Specs
| GeForce 840A | Radeon R9 370 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 110 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
- Radeon R9 370 has 233% more power consumption, than GeForce 840A.
- GeForce 840A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 370 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 840A and Radeon R9 370 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce 840A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 370 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 840A is 104 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 370.
- GeForce 840A and Radeon R9 370 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 3598 MHz higher, than GeForce 840A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Battlefield 5 is 545% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 840A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Radeon R9 370. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Dota 2 is 121% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Far Cry 5 is 585% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Fortnite is 363% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 550% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 315% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Metro Exodus is 800% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 630% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 840A | Radeon R9 370 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM108 | Trinidad |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 975 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.98 | 78.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
| Length | 221 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 5600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 336 Mh/s | |