GeForce GTX 680MX vs Radeon R9 370
When comparing GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon R9 370, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon R9 370 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 370
GeForce GTX 680MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 680MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 680MX here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon R9 370 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | 110 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 680MX has 10% more power consumption, than Radeon R9 370.
- GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon R9 370 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 680MX is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 370 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 680MX is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 370 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 205 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
- GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon R9 370 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 3100 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Battlefield 5 is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Far Cry 5 is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Fortnite is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 46% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Metro Exodus is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 24% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 67% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 680MX. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon R9 370 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Trinidad | |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 23 October 2012 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 925 MHz |
Boost Clock | 975 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3540 Million | 2,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 78.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | |
Length | 221 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 5600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
3D Vision | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 57 Mh/s | 336 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |