GeForce MX230 vs Radeon R9 370
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce MX230 and Radeon R9 370. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce MX230 and Radeon R9 370. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R9 370
GeForce MX230 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX230 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX230 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX230 | Radeon R9 370 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 110 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Radeon R9 370 has 1000% more power consumption, than GeForce MX230.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce MX230 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 370.
- GeForce MX230 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 370 - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX230 is build with Pascal architecture, and Radeon R9 370 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX230 is 594 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 370.
- GeForce MX230 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 370 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX230 is 1400 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 370.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 241% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Battlefield 5 is 257% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Dota 2 is 64% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Fortnite is 200% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Minecraft is 28% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GeForce MX230. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX230 | Radeon R9 370 | |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N17S-G0 | Trinidad |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 20 February 2019 | 5 May 2015 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 1280 |
| Core clock speed | 1519 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1531 MHz | 975 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,800 million | 2,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 25.31 | 78.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | |
| Length | 221 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 336 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |