Quadro 4000M vs Radeon R9 370
In this comparison between Quadro 4000M and Radeon R9 370 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 4000M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 370 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 370
Quadro 4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 4000M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 4000M | Radeon R9 370 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 110 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 370 has 10% more power consumption, than Quadro 4000M.
- Quadro 4000M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R9 370 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro 4000M and Radeon R9 370 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Quadro 4000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 370 - in Desktops.
- Quadro 4000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R9 370 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 450 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
- Quadro 4000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 370 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 4400 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Battlefield 5 is 580% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 172% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Dota 2 is 112% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Far Cry 5 is 685% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Fortnite is 357% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 536% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 336% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Quadro 4000M. |
Full Specs
Quadro 4000M | Radeon R9 370 | |
Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Fermi | Trinidad |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 22 February 2011 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 336 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 475 MHz | 925 MHz |
Boost Clock | 975 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 2,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 26.60 | 78.00 |
Floating-point performance | 638.4 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
Length | 221 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 5600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | 336 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |