Quadro M520 vs Radeon R9 370
When choosing between Quadro M520 and Radeon R9 370, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Quadro M520 and Radeon R9 370.
Radeon R9 370
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro M520 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M520 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M520 here:
Main Specs
Quadro M520 | Radeon R9 370 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 110 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 370 has 340% more power consumption, than Quadro M520.
- Quadro M520 and Radeon R9 370 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Quadro M520 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 370 - in Desktops.
- Quadro M520 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 370 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 169 MHz higher, than Quadro M520.
- Quadro M520 and Radeon R9 370 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 241% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Battlefield 5 is 257% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Dota 2 is 64% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Fortnite is 200% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 158% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than Quadro M520. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Quadro M520. |
Full Specs
Quadro M520 | Radeon R9 370 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Trinidad | |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 13 January 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 756 MHz | 925 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1019 MHz | 975 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 78.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | |
Length | 221 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 40 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 336 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
3D Stereo | + | |
Check Price |