Radeon Pro WX 4150 vs Radeon R9 370
When comparing Radeon Pro WX 4150 and Radeon R9 370, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon Pro WX 4150 and Radeon R9 370 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 370
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 4150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 4150 here:
Main Specs
Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon R9 370 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 4150 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 370.
- Radeon Pro WX 4150 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 370 - in Desktops.
- Radeon Pro WX 4150 is build with Polaris architecture, and Radeon R9 370 - with GCN 1.0.
- Radeon Pro WX 4150 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 370 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 4150 is 1400 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 370.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 241% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Battlefield 5 is 240% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Dota 2 is 64% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Fortnite is 191% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 264% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Radeon Pro WX 4150. |
Full Specs
Radeon Pro WX 4150 | Radeon R9 370 | |
Architecture | Polaris | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Polaris 11 | Trinidad |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 1 March 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 896 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 925 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1053 MHz | 975 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 78.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,496 gflops | |
Length | 221 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | 5600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 12 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 336 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |