Radeon R9 380 vs Tesla C2075

In this comparison between Radeon R9 380 and Tesla C2075 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon R9 380 will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2075 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Main Specs

  Radeon R9 380 Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP) 190 Watt 247 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors 2 x 6-pin 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort 1x DVI
  Check Price Check Price
  • Tesla C2075 has 30% more power consumption, than Radeon R9 380.
  • Radeon R9 380 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
  • Tesla C2075 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 380.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • Radeon R9 380 is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
  • Radeon R9 380 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
  • Tesla C2075 is 27 mm longer, than Radeon R9 380.
  • Memory clock speed of Tesla C2075 is 2162 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 380.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 35−40 16−18
ultra / 1080p 21−24 10−11
QHD / 1440p 16−18 4−5
4K / 2160p 10−11
low / 720p 60−65 35−40
medium / 1080p 40−45 21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 380 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Tesla C2075.

Full Specs

  Radeon R9 380 Tesla C2075
Architecture GCN Fermi 2.0
Code name Tonga Pro GF110
Type Desktop Workstation
Release date 26 June 2015 25 July 2011
Pipelines 1792 448
Core clock speed 574 MHz
Boost Clock 970 MHz
Transistor count 5,000 million 3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Texture fill rate 108.6 32.14
Floating-point performance 3,476 gflops 1,030.4 gflops
Length 221 mm 248 mm
Memory bus width 256 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 970 MHz 3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth 182.4 GB/s 150.3 GB/s
Shared memory -
DirectX 12 (11_0)
Shader Model 6.3 5.1
OpenGL 4.5 4.6
OpenCL 2.0 1.1
Vulkan + N/A
CUDA 2.0
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) 0.48 kh/s
FreeSync +
Bus support PCIe 3.0
HDMI +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 404 Mh/s 94 Mh/s
Eyefinity +
HD3D +
PowerTune +
TrueAudio +
ZeroCore +
Mantle +
Design reference
Bridgeless CrossFire +
Number of Eyefinity displays 6
DisplayPort support +
CrossFire +
VCE +
DDMA audio +
Decred / DCR (Decred) 0.66 Gh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 18 Mh/s
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) 168.45 Sol/s
Compute units 28
Form factor full height / full length / dual slot
High bandwidth memory (HBM) -
LiquidVR +
FRTC +
  Check Price Check Price