Quadro K2200 vs Radeon R9 390X

In this comparison between Quadro K2200 and Radeon R9 390X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 390X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Main Specs

  Quadro K2200 Radeon R9 390X
Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt 275 Watt
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
  Check Price Check Price
  • Radeon R9 390X has 304% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200.
  • Quadro K2200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 390X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • Quadro K2200 is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 390X - with GCN.
  • Quadro K2200 and Radeon R9 390X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
  • Radeon R9 390X is 73 mm longer, than Quadro K2200.
  • Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200 is 3962 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 390X.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 18−20 50−55
ultra / 1080p 10−11 30−35
QHD / 1440p 5−6 24−27
4K / 2160p 4−5 14−16
low / 720p 35−40 75−80
medium / 1080p 21−24 55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 390X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 168% more, than Quadro K2200.

Full Specs

  Quadro K2200 Radeon R9 390X
Architecture Maxwell GCN
Code name GM107 Grenada XT
Type Workstation Desktop
Release date 22 July 2014 16 June 2015
Pipelines 640 2816
Core clock speed 1046 MHz
Boost Clock 1124 MHz 1050 MHz
Transistor count 1,870 million 6,200 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 44.96 184.8
Floating-point performance 1,439 gflops 5,914 gflops
Length 202 mm 275 mm
Memory bus width 128 Bit 512 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz 1050 MHz
Memory bandwidth 80.19 GB/s 384 GB/s
Shared memory -
DirectX 12 (11_0)
Shader Model 5.1 6.3
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 1.2 2.0
Vulkan 1.1.126 +
CUDA 5.0
FreeSync +
Bus support PCIe 3.0
HDMI +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 162 Mh/s 684 Mh/s
Eyefinity +
PowerTune +
TrueAudio +
Mantle +
Design reference
Bridgeless CrossFire +
Number of Eyefinity displays 6
DisplayPort support +
CrossFire +
VCE +
DDMA audio +
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 1.6 Mh/s 27.5 Mh/s
High bandwidth memory (HBM) -
  Check Price Check Price