FirePro M4000 vs Radeon R9 A375
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro M4000 and Radeon R9 A375. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro M4000 and Radeon R9 A375. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R9 A375
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4000 | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 A375 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 A375 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 300 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 and Radeon R9 A375 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro M4000 is 4496 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro M4000 and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 29% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Dota 2 is 30% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Fortnite is 63% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 66% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Minecraft is 11% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M4000 in World of Tanks is 20% more, than Radeon R9 A375. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4000 | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Architecture | GCN | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Cape Verde GLM | Venus |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 1 July 2012 | no data |
Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 4.5 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2 |
Bus support | n/a | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro M4000 vs Quadro K3000M
- FirePro M4000 vs Quadro K2000D
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro K3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro K2000D
- FirePro M4000 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- FirePro M4000 vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M