FirePro M7740 vs Radeon R9 A375

In this comparison between FirePro M7740 and Radeon R9 A375 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M7740 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 A375 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro M7740 Check Price

Radeon R9 A375

FirePro M7740 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: FirePro M7740 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M7740 here:

FirePro M7740 Laptops

Main Specs

	FirePro M7740	Radeon R9 A375
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price

FirePro M7740 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon R9 A375 has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M7740.
FirePro M7740 is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 A375 - in Desktops.
FirePro M7740 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 250 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
FirePro M7740 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 A375 - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro M7740 is 996 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	6−7	2−3
ultra / 1080p	4−5	1−2
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	16−18	12−14
medium / 1080p	8−9	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 80% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	10−11	5−6
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	16−18
medium / 1080p	12−14	6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Battlefield 5 is 77% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro M7740 and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	130−140	120−130
medium / 768p	110−120	95−100
ultra / 1080p	50−55	40−45
QHD / 1440p	27−30	21−24
4K / 2160p	27−30	16−18
high / 768p	80−85	65−70
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 17% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	55−60	65−70
ultra / 1080p	18−20	20−22
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than FirePro M7740.
low / 768p	80−85	75−80
medium / 768p	55−60	45−50
ultra / 1080p	30−35	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p	8−9	2−3
ultra / 1080p	7−8	2−3
4K / 2160p	3−4	2−3
low / 720p	18−20	10−12
medium / 1080p	8−9	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p	14−16	10−11
ultra / 1080p	10−11	5−6
QHD / 1440p	−	4−5
low / 720p	60−65	50−55
medium / 1080p	21−24	10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Fortnite is 42% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p	12−14	5−6
ultra / 1080p	10−12	−
QHD / 1440p	1−2	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	24−27	18−20
medium / 1080p	14−16	8−9
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Forza Horizon 4 is 44% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
medium / 768p	45−50	−
high / 1080p	12−14	4−5
ultra / 1080p	6−7	2−3
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p	4−5	2−3
ultra / 1080p	3−4	0−1
4K / 2160p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	12−14	4−5
medium / 1080p	6−7	3−4
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	95−100	85−90
high / 1080p	85−90	80−85
ultra / 1080p	80−85	−
4K / 2160p	−	75−80
medium / 1080p	90−95	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	12−14
low / 720p	30−35	27−30
medium / 1080p	18−20	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
ultra / 1080p	7−8	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	12−14	6−7
medium / 1080p	10−12	−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	24−27	10−11
medium / 768p	16−18	8−9
high / 1080p	9−10	4−5
ultra / 1080p	6−7	4−5
4K / 2160p	6−7	1−2
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 160% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	85−90	75−80
medium / 768p	45−50	35−40
ultra / 1080p	18−20	14−16
high / 768p	35−40	30−33
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M7740 in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Radeon R9 A375.

Full Specs

	FirePro M7740	Radeon R9 A375
Architecture	Terascale 1	GCN 1.0
Code name	RV740	Venus
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	4 August 2009	no data
Pipelines	640	640
Core clock speed	650 MHz	900 MHz
Boost Clock		925 MHz
Transistor count	826 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	20.80	37.00
Floating-point performance	832.0 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	4.5 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	54.14 GB/s	72 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	4.1	5.1
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
Laptop size	large
	Check Price

FirePro M7740 vs Radeon R9 A375

FirePro M7740 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares