FirePro W7170M vs Radeon R9 A375
When choosing between FirePro W7170M and Radeon R9 A375, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W7170M and Radeon R9 A375.
Radeon R9 A375
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7170M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W7170M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 A375.
- FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 A375 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 177 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M and Radeon R9 A375 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7170M is 4996 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 380% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Battlefield 5 is 388% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W7170M and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 108% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Far Cry 5 is 550% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 237% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 357% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Metro Exodus is 633% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 560% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in World of Tanks is 57% more, than Radeon R9 A375. |
Full Specs
FirePro W7170M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Architecture | GCN 3 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Tonga | Venus |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 2 October 2015 | no data |
Pipelines | 2048 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4.5 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2 |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
AppAcceleration | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W7170M vs Radeon RX 460 mobile
- FirePro W7170M vs Radeon HD 7850
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon RX 460 mobile
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 7850
- FirePro W7170M vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- FirePro W7170M vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M