GeForce GTS 360M vs Radeon R9 A375
In this comparison between GeForce GTS 360M and Radeon R9 A375 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTS 360M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 A375 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 A375
GeForce GTS 360M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 360M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 360M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTS 360M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 38 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTS 360M is connected by MXM-II, and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 A375 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 360M.
- GeForce GTS 360M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 A375 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTS 360M is build with GT2xx architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 360M is 536 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
- GeForce GTS 360M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 A375 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 360M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 196% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 360M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Dota 2 is 113% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Minecraft is 60% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | − | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in World of Tanks is 92% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTS 360M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
| Architecture | GT2xx | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N11E-GS1 | Venus |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 7 January 2010 | no data |
| Pipelines | 96 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1436 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 727 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.60 | 37.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 275.71 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4.5 GB/s | |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Gigaflops | 413 | |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| Check Price |