GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon R9 A375
When comparing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon R9 A375, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon R9 A375 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R9 A375
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 630 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 A375 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 7996 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−12 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 780% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 20−22 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Battlefield 5 is 766% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 190−200 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 120−130 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 193% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 134% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | − |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Far Cry 5 is 1175% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 190−200 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 487% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 65−70 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Forza Horizon 4 is 800% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | − |
high / 1080p | 75−80 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 377% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Metro Exodus is 1466% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1100% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1240% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | − | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 62% more, than Radeon R9 A375. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | TU117 | Venus |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | no data | no data |
Pipelines | 1024 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 37.00 | |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 4.5 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2 | |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon RX 570
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Tesla M6
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon RX 570
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Tesla M6
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M