GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 A375
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R9 A375, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 295 stacks up against Radeon R9 A375, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 295
Radeon R9 A375
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1790 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 A375.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 342 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 A375 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 995 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Dota 2 is 6% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Far Cry 5 is 40% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Fortnite is 15% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Minecraft is 2% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GT200B | Venus |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | no data |
Pipelines | 240 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 4.5 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M