GeForce GTX 670 vs Radeon R9 A375

In this comparison between GeForce GTX 670 and Radeon R9 A375 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 670 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 A375 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Main Specs

  GeForce GTX 670 Radeon R9 A375
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors Two 6-pin
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Display Connectors 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort No outputs
  Check Price
  • Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
  • GeForce GTX 670 and Radeon R9 A375 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • GeForce GTX 670 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
  • Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 670 is 80 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
  • GeForce GTX 670 and Radeon R9 A375 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 670 is 2 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 35−40 2−3
ultra / 1080p 21−24 1−2
QHD / 1440p 16−18 0−1
4K / 2160p 10−11
low / 720p 60−65 12−14
medium / 1080p 40−45 4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 670 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than Radeon R9 A375.

Full Specs

  GeForce GTX 670 Radeon R9 A375
Architecture Kepler GCN 1.0
Code name GK104 Venus
Type Desktop Desktop
Release date 10 May 2012 no data
Pipelines 1344 640
Core clock speed 980 MHz 900 MHz
Boost Clock 980 MHz 925 MHz
Transistor count 3,540 million 1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 102.5 billion/sec 37.00
Floating-point performance 2,459.5 gflops
Length 9.5" (24.1 cm)
Memory bus width 256-bit GDDR5 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 6.0 GB/s 4.5 GB/s
Memory bandwidth 192.2 GB/s 72 GB/s
DirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (11_1)
Shader Model 5.1 5.1
OpenGL 4.2 4.6
OpenCL 1.2 1.2
Vulkan 1.1.126 1.2
CUDA +
CUDA cores 1344
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
SLI options +
Multi monitor support 4 displays
HDMI +
HDCP +
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI Internal
3D Blu-Ray +
3D Gaming +
3D Vision +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 97 Mh/s
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) 13 Mh/s
  Check Price