GeForce GTX 680MX vs Radeon R9 A375
When comparing GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon R9 A375, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon R9 A375 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 A375
GeForce GTX 680MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 680MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 680MX here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon R9 A375 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 680MX is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 A375 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 680MX is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 180 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 680MX.
- GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon R9 A375 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 680MX is 2496 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 420% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Battlefield 5 is 433% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 141% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Dota 2 is 118% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Far Cry 5 is 625% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Fortnite is 268% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Forza Horizon 4 is 414% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Grand Theft Auto V is 205% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Metro Exodus is 733% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 640% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 680MX in World of Tanks is 57% more, than Radeon R9 A375. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Venus | |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 23 October 2012 | no data |
Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 720 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3540 Million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 37.00 |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 4.5 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2 | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
3D Vision | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 57 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 680MX vs Quadro P1000
- GeForce GTX 680MX vs Quadro K4200
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro P1000
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro K4200
- GeForce GTX 680MX vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- GeForce GTX 680MX vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M