GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon R9 A375
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon R9 A375. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon R9 A375. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R9 A375
GeForce GTX 965M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 965M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 965M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 965M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 965M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 965M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 A375.
- GeForce GTX 965M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 A375 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 965M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 44 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
- GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon R9 A375 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 965M is 2496 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 380% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Battlefield 5 is 388% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 965M and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Dota 2 is 108% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Fortnite is 237% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Forza Horizon 4 is 357% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 560% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 965M in World of Tanks is 57% more, than Radeon R9 A375. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 965M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N16E-GS, N16E-GR | Venus |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 5 January 2015 | no data |
Pipelines | 1024 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 944 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 / 1151 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,940 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 73.60 | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,355 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 4.5 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
G-SYNC support | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1024 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 226 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
BatteryBoost | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon HD 8970M
- GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon HD 6930
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8970M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 6930
- GeForce GTX 965M vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- GeForce GTX 965M vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M