GRID K220Q vs Radeon R9 A375
In this comparison between GRID K220Q and Radeon R9 A375 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K220Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 A375 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K220Q
Radeon R9 A375
Main Specs
| GRID K220Q | Radeon R9 A375 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K220Q has 510 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 A375.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K220Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 155 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
- GRID K220Q and Radeon R9 A375 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K220Q is 4996 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Battlefield 5 is 28% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GRID K220Q and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Dota 2 is 11% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Far Cry 5 is 25% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Fortnite is 20% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K220Q | Radeon R9 A375 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GK104 | Venus |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 July 2014 | no data |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 37.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4.5 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |