GRID K240Q vs Radeon R9 A375

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K240Q and Radeon R9 A375, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K240Q stacks up against Radeon R9 A375, check out specs charts below.
GRID K240Q
Radeon R9 A375

Main Specs

  GRID K240Q Radeon R9 A375
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
 
  • Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
  • Radeon R9 A375 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
  • Both cards are used in Desktops.
  • GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
  • Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 155 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
  • GRID K240Q and Radeon R9 A375 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 4996 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 10−11 2−3
ultra / 1080p 6−7 1−2
QHD / 1440p 1−2 0−1
low / 720p 21−24 12−14
medium / 1080p 12−14 4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 160% more, than Radeon R9 A375.

Full Specs

  GRID K240Q Radeon R9 A375
Architecture Kepler GCN 1.0
Code name GK104 Venus
Type Workstation Desktop
Release date 28 June 2013 no data
Pipelines 1536 640
Core clock speed 745 MHz 900 MHz
Boost Clock 925 MHz
Transistor count 3,540 million 1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 95.36 37.00
Floating-point performance 2,289 gflops
Memory bus width 256 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz 4.5 GB/s
Memory bandwidth 160.0 GB/s 72 GB/s
DirectX 12 (11_0) 12 (11_1)
Shader Model 5.1 5.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
OpenCL 1.2 1.2
Vulkan 1.1.126 1.2
CUDA 3.0