GRID K260Q vs Radeon R9 A375

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K260Q and Radeon R9 A375. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K260Q and Radeon R9 A375. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

GRID K260Q

Radeon R9 A375

Main Specs

	GRID K260Q	Radeon R9 A375
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GRID K260Q and Radeon R9 A375 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 155 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
GRID K260Q and Radeon R9 A375 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 4996 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	14−16	2−3
ultra / 1080p	9−10	1−2
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	12−14
medium / 1080p	18−20	4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 280% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p	24−27	−
ultra / 1080p	21−24	5−6
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	50−55	16−18
medium / 1080p	27−30	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 277% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	40−45
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q.
low / 768p	210−220	120−130
medium / 768p	180−190	95−100
ultra / 1080p	95−100	40−45
QHD / 1440p	50−55	21−24
4K / 2160p	30−33	16−18
high / 768p	140−150	65−70
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 95% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	55−60	65−70
ultra / 1080p	40−45	20−22
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	110−120	75−80
medium / 768p	90−95	45−50
ultra / 1080p	60−65	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 83% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p	18−20	2−3
ultra / 1080p	16−18	2−3
4K / 2160p	6−7	2−3
low / 720p	35−40	10−12
medium / 1080p	18−20	4−5
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p	24−27	10−11
ultra / 1080p	18−20	5−6
QHD / 1440p	16−18	4−5
low / 720p	95−100	50−55
medium / 1080p	50−55	10−12
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 162% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p	24−27	5−6
ultra / 1080p	20−22	−
QHD / 1440p	9−10	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	50−55	18−20
medium / 1080p	27−30	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 222% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	85−90	45−50
medium / 768p	75−80	−
high / 1080p	30−33	4−5
ultra / 1080p	12−14	2−3
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
medium / 720p	−	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 144% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p	9−10	2−3
ultra / 1080p	7−8	0−1
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	4−5
medium / 1080p	12−14	3−4
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	110−120	85−90
high / 1080p	−	80−85
ultra / 1080p	100−110	−
4K / 2160p	−	75−80
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	12−14
low / 720p	55−60	27−30
medium / 1080p	24−27	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	−
low / 720p	27−30	6−7
medium / 1080p	16−18	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 366% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	55−60	10−11
medium / 768p	30−35	8−9
high / 1080p	18−20	4−5
ultra / 1080p	10−12	4−5
4K / 2160p	8−9	1−2
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 400% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p	100−110	75−80
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
ultra / 1080p	35−40	14−16
high / 768p	50−55	30−33
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 60% more, than Radeon R9 A375.

Full Specs

	GRID K260Q	Radeon R9 A375
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Code name	GK104	Venus
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	28 June 2013	no data
Pipelines	1536	640
Core clock speed	745 MHz	900 MHz
Boost Clock		925 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	37.00
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	4.5 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	72 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2
CUDA	3.0

GRID K260Q vs Radeon R9 A375

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares