Iris Graphics 540 vs Radeon R9 A375
When choosing between Iris Graphics 540 and Radeon R9 A375, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Iris Graphics 540 and Radeon R9 A375.
Radeon R9 A375
Iris Graphics 540 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 540 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 540 here:
Main Specs
Iris Graphics 540 | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Graphics 540 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Graphics 540 has 62 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 A375.
- Iris Graphics 540 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 A375 - in Desktops.
- Iris Graphics 540 is build with Gen. 9 Skylake architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 600 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 540.
- Iris Graphics 540 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 A375 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Graphics 540 and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 38% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Graphics 540. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Dota 2 is 32% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Fortnite is 73% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Forza Horizon 4 is 88% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Grand Theft Auto V is 61% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Metro Exodus is 233% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Minecraft is 14% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 220% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 540 in World of Tanks is 32% more, than Radeon R9 A375. |
Full Specs
Iris Graphics 540 | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Architecture | Gen. 9 Skylake | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Skylake GT3e | Venus |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 1 September 2015 | no data |
Pipelines | 48 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 50.40 | 37.00 |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4.5 GB/s | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.97 | 1.2 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Graphics 540 vs GeForce GTX 460M SLI
- Iris Graphics 540 vs GeForce MX150
- Radeon R9 A375 vs GeForce GTX 460M SLI
- Radeon R9 A375 vs GeForce MX150
- Iris Graphics 540 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Iris Graphics 540 vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M