Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs Radeon R9 A375
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU and Radeon R9 A375 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 A375 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 A375
Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU here:
Main Specs
| Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU | Radeon R9 A375 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 A375 - in Desktops.
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is build with Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 600 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU.
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU is manufactured by 10 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 A375 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Dota 2 is 40% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Fortnite is 78% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 220% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU in World of Tanks is 32% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
Full Specs
| Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU | Radeon R9 A375 | |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Ice Lake G4 Gen. 11 | Venus |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 28 May 2019 | no data |
| Pipelines | 48 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 37.00 | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4.5 GB/s | |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs GeForce GTX 950A
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs GeForce GTX 960A
- Radeon R9 A375 vs GeForce GTX 950A
- Radeon R9 A375 vs GeForce GTX 960A
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M