Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon R9 A375
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and Radeon R9 A375, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 stacks up against Radeon R9 A375, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R9 A375
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | eDRAM | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 126 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 A375.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 A375 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is build with Gen. 7.5 Haswell architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 700 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by 22 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 A375 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Battlefield 5 is 122% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 40% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 78% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 183% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 220% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 32% more, than Radeon R9 A375. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Architecture | Gen. 7.5 Haswell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Haswell GT3e | Venus |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 5 June 2013 | no data |
Pipelines | 40 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 200 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 392 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 52.00 | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 104.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4.5 GB/s | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.2 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M