Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R9 A375
In this comparison between Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon R9 A375 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Pro Graphics 6200 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 A375 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 A375
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x1, and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 A375 - in Desktops.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is build with Gen. 8 Broadwell architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 600 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 A375 - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Fortnite is 15% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | − |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 6200 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Radeon R9 A375. |
Full Specs
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Architecture | Gen. 8 Broadwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Broadwell GT3e | Venus |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 June 2015 | no data |
Pipelines | 48 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 40.80 | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4.5 GB/s | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.80 | 1.2 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M