Quadro 2000M vs Radeon R9 A375
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Quadro 2000M and Radeon R9 A375. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Quadro 2000M and Radeon R9 A375. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R9 A375
Quadro 2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 2000M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro 2000M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro 2000M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro 2000M and Radeon R9 A375 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Quadro 2000M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 A375 - in Desktops.
- Quadro 2000M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 350 MHz higher, than Quadro 2000M.
- Quadro 2000M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 A375 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 2000M is 896 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 196% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Dota 2 is 113% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Fortnite is 136% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Minecraft is 60% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | − | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in World of Tanks is 92% more, than Quadro 2000M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro 2000M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Fermi | Venus |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 22 February 2011 | no data |
| Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.60 | 37.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 422.4 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 4.5 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro 2000M vs GeForce GT 640M
- Quadro 2000M vs GeForce GT 445M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs GeForce GT 640M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs GeForce GT 445M
- Quadro 2000M vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Quadro 2000M vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M