Quadro 5010M vs Radeon R9 A375
In this comparison between Quadro 5010M and Radeon R9 A375 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro 5010M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 A375 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 A375
Quadro 5010M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5010M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5010M here:
Main Specs
Quadro 5010M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 ECC | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro 5010M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro 5010M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 A375.
- Quadro 5010M is used in Mobile workstations, and Radeon R9 A375 - in Desktops.
- Quadro 5010M is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 450 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
- Quadro 5010M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 A375 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro 5010M is 1296 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Dota 2 is 42% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Fortnite is 84% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Forza Horizon 4 is 111% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in World of Tanks is 32% more, than Radeon R9 A375. |
Full Specs
Quadro 5010M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Architecture | Fermi | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N12E-Q5 | Venus |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 22 February 2011 | no data |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,000 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1300 MHz | 4.5 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro 5010M vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Quadro 5010M vs Radeon R7 M275DX
- Radeon R9 A375 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon R7 M275DX
- Quadro 5010M vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Quadro 5010M vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M