Subscribe to our YouTube channel ×

    Quadro CX vs Radeon R9 A375

    If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro CX and Radeon R9 A375, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro CX stacks up against Radeon R9 A375, check out specs charts below.
    Quadro CX
    Radeon R9 A375

    Main Specs

      Quadro CX Radeon R9 A375
    Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt
    Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
    Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin
    Memory type GDDR3 GDDR5
    Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 2 GB
    Display Connectors 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video No outputs
     
    • Quadro CX is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
    • Quadro CX has 1534 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 A375.
    • Both cards are used in Desktops.
    • Quadro CX is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
    • Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 298 MHz higher, than Quadro CX.
    • Quadro CX is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 A375 - by 28 nm process technology.
    • Memory clock speed of Quadro CX is 1596 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.

    Game benchmarks

    high / 1080p 1−2 2−3
    ultra / 1080p 0−1 1−2
    QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
    low / 720p 10−12 12−14
    medium / 1080p 2−3 4−5
    The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than Quadro CX.

    Full Specs

      Quadro CX Radeon R9 A375
    Architecture Tesla 2.0 GCN 1.0
    Code name GT200B Venus
    Type Workstation Desktop
    Release date 11 November 2008 no data
    Pipelines 192 640
    Core clock speed 602 MHz 900 MHz
    Boost Clock 925 MHz
    Transistor count 1,400 million 1,500 million
    Manufacturing process technology 55 nm 28 nm
    Texture fill rate 38.53 37.00
    Floating-point performance 462.3 gflops
    Length 267 mm
    Memory bus width 384 Bit 128 Bit
    Memory clock speed 1600 MHz 4.5 GB/s
    Memory bandwidth 76.8 GB/s 72 GB/s
    DirectX 11.1 (10_0) 12 (11_1)
    Shader Model 4.0 5.1
    OpenGL 3.3 4.6
    OpenCL 1.1 1.2
    Vulkan N/A 1.2
    CUDA 1.3
     

    Similar compares