Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon R9 A375
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon R9 A375, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Quadro FX 4800 stacks up against Radeon R9 A375, check out specs charts below.
Quadro FX 4800
Radeon R9 A375
Main Specs
Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
- Quadro FX 4800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1534 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 A375.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- Quadro FX 4800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 A375 is 298 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 A375 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro FX 4800 is 1596 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Battlefield 5 is 12% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Dota 2 is 2% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Minecraft is 2% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
low / 720p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Quadro FX 4800. |
Full Specs
Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GT200B | Venus |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 11 November 2008 | no data |
Pipelines | 192 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 4.5 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Similar compares
- Quadro FX 4800 vs GeForce 830M
- Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon E6760
- Radeon R9 A375 vs GeForce 830M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon E6760
- Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Quadro FX 4800 vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M