Quadro K2000 vs Radeon R9 A375
In this comparison between Quadro K2000 and Radeon R9 A375 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro K2000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 A375 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R9 A375
Main Specs
Quadro K2000
Radeon R9 A375
Power consumption (TDP)
51 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Quadro K2000 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Quadro K2000 and Radeon R9 A375 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Quadro K2000 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro K2000 is 54 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Quadro K2000 and Radeon R9 A375 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2000 is 3996 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
2−3
ultra / 1080p
4−5
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
16−18
12−14
medium / 1080p
9−10
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 80% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
10−12
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
16−18
medium / 1080p
12−14
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Battlefield 5 is 77% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
Quadro K2000 and Radeon R9 A375 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
140−150
120−130
medium / 768p
110−120
95−100
ultra / 1080p
55−60
40−45
QHD / 1440p
30−35
21−24
4K / 2160p
27−30
16−18
high / 768p
85−90
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p
55−60
65−70
ultra / 1080p
21−24
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 A375 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Quadro K2000.
low / 768p
80−85
75−80
medium / 768p
60−65
45−50
ultra / 1080p
35−40
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Dota 2 is 22% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p
9−10
2−3
ultra / 1080p
8−9
2−3
4K / 2160p
4−5
2−3
low / 720p
20−22
10−12
medium / 1080p
9−10
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p
14−16
10−11
ultra / 1080p
10−12
5−6
QHD / 1440p
−
4−5
low / 720p
60−65
50−55
medium / 1080p
24−27
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Fortnite is 47% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p
12−14
5−6
ultra / 1080p
10−12
−
QHD / 1440p
1−2
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
27−30
18−20
medium / 1080p
14−16
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 55% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p
55−60
45−50
medium / 768p
45−50
−
high / 1080p
12−14
4−5
ultra / 1080p
7−8
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p
5−6
2−3
ultra / 1080p
3−4
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
4−5
medium / 1080p
7−8
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Metro Exodus is 166% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p
95−100
85−90
high / 1080p
90−95
80−85
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
4K / 2160p
−
75−80
medium / 1080p
90−95
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Minecraft is 11% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
12−14
low / 720p
30−35
27−30
medium / 1080p
18−20
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
12−14
6−7
medium / 1080p
10−12
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 116% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p
27−30
10−11
medium / 768p
18−20
8−9
high / 1080p
10−11
4−5
ultra / 1080p
6−7
4−5
4K / 2160p
6−7
1−2
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
low / 768p
85−90
75−80
medium / 768p
45−50
35−40
ultra / 1080p
20−22
14−16
high / 768p
35−40
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2000 in World of Tanks is 20% more, than Radeon R9 A375.
Full Specs
Quadro K2000
Radeon R9 A375
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Code name
GK107
Venus
Type
Workstation
Desktop
Release date
1 March 2013
no data
Pipelines
384
640
Core clock speed
954 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
30.53
37.00
Floating-point performance
732.7 gflops
Length
202 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
4.5 GB/s
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
72 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2
CUDA
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
24 Mh/s
Check Price
